<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hemingway and Clarity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorwantabes.markshawbooks.net/2008/06/27/hemingway-and-clarity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorwantabes.markshawbooks.net/2008/06/27/hemingway-and-clarity/</link>
	<description>Writing Tips, Publishing Strategies, and 101 Literary Ideas for Aspiring Authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meander</title>
		<link>http://authorwantabes.markshawbooks.net/2008/06/27/hemingway-and-clarity/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Meander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hemingwaywantabes.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Yes I suppose we have been taught that this lesson from all of our combined writing classes, to keep cutting words until we have the bare bones.  Yet I sometimes think this is a way to masculinize our writing. What is so wrong with a little flowery language now and then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I suppose we have been taught that this lesson from all of our combined writing classes, to keep cutting words until we have the bare bones.  Yet I sometimes think this is a way to masculinize our writing. What is so wrong with a little flowery language now and then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
